On December 13.12.2015, 20 at 05:XNUMX p.m. Mirko N. wrote: Yasin Akgün's answers are in red:
Hello again,
what reasons speak against the cheaper filters you offer? Can't the swirler be mounted on it?
>The cheaper “Modern” filter is almost as good as the more expensive one, the only difference is that you can’t connect a swirler to the Modern filter; counter pressure at the end of the outlet doesn’t work with it, it would burst.
And otherwise, with the more expensive filter you can always replace the included hollow fiber membrane filter, but with the Modern it is not possible because there is only activated carbon without a hollow fiber membrane. The hollow fiber membrane guarantees that no viruses and bacteria can flow through, but the activated carbon is also a virus and bacteria filter, but not 100%
In my opinion, without hollow fiber, thick ones are sufficient for our fairly clean water. In addition to the typical chemicals, both also safely filter out heavy metals, and that is important.
You speak out against reverse osmosis in your videos. It is certainly a controversial topic that too much lime is unhealthy. It's certainly not beneficial in large quantities, but surely you won't suffer a deficiency in the calcium content of our food?
>With the rabbit water, my hair grows faster, fingernails grow faster, more ear wax, etc. You keep pouring a little more alkaline minerals into the body. This is always git.
We don't get calcified because of the water, but because of completely different issues such as acid-base imbalance, homocysteine value issues, high blood pressure. The water helps against these issues.
I hear a lot about how pollutants and slag removal works better with particularly pure (osmosis?) water because it can absorb even more substances in solution.
>Would you wash your greasy pan with water or with soapy water. Everything you've heard is speculation from some discussants, here's the water fact creator:
http://aquacentrum.de/video-geschichte-basisches-wasser-und-wasserionisierer/
You can find an interview about the lecture here:
https://www.aquacentrum.de/saq/
The video on the right is particularly important because it contains the latest findings.
As for the vortex story: It is said that the "memory of water is erased" (esoteric formulation), or the molecular clustering is broken up. This is also supposed to make the water more soluble. There is also criticism of this theory: in liquid water, the hydrogen bonds would constantly break down and form again, and such a bridge would only last in the picosecond range (then "information storage" would not be an option at all)...
>It's all speculation to the power of 10 because people didn't understand the 73 anomalies in the water. The swirlers aren't bad, but it's only 10% of the cost of water treatment. By the way, water ionizers produce the most "turbulent" water, they are micro-vortices that arise because the electrodes are + and - charged, and since the water is a dipole, it will accordingly dissolve its previous cluster structures, forming smaller, more uniform ones.
Mr. Asenbaum explains that alkaline activation of water is destroyed by subsequent swirling.
Afterwards, yes, since we then let the hydrogen react early, not to nothing, but not sensible. Who before, with the UMH:
On the following page is the UMH Pure Gold, which is mounted under a tap on the cold water pipe or in front of an ionizer:
https://www.aquacentrum.de/shop/umh-pure-vergoldet-kalkwandler/
The water is then 10% stronger, with an ionizer installed upstream.
Am I correctly summarizing that there are two possibilities:
1) A filter with subsequent turbulence. Activated carbon or reverse osmosis a religious question... Not a religious question, but would you use distilled water from the >Buy gas station and drink. That's common sense + we have the facts, look at them Lecture You're welcome.
2) An ionizer WITHOUT turbulence.
>Test ionization, you will feel it, whether with or without UMH, it's all a question of money and taste, as the UMH minimally makes the taste even more soft.
The esotericist will probably reject the ionizer because the water is not swirled/levitated/disinformed or similar.
>I'm also a bit of an "esoteric"; I was against it for two years because of the electricity until I got a water ionizer. Now everything is easier because with the ionizer everything is provable and measurable. That's good. Esoteric means that you don't have the 2 anomalies of water in your sights, but I know that there are still many unanswered questions.
In a video lecture, unfortunately I can't remember which one, Mr. Asenbaum answers the question of whether alkaline water is unhealthy: Due to the low buffering of the water compared to stomach acid, the pH value in the stomach practically does not change. This sounds very obvious, but raises an additional question:
Doesn't this low level of buffering lead to a negligible impact on the organism?
>As written above, you keep pouring more alkaline and less acidic minerals into the human water bag. In the long run you will feel the difference:
Less bad breath and more fitness. The lecture and the FAQ section can be found here: https://www.aquacentrum.de/saq/
What speaks against simply stirring baking soda into drinking water? http://phkillscancer.com
I have already done this in the form of a treatment and achieved a urine pH of >9.
>Urine pH-9 could mean many things, including your body getting rid of excess minerals, and it could also mean you have a kidney problem. Urine is not useful, the saliva test is the most useful because it shows the current pH value of the interstitial fluid, the extracellular fluid.
The rabbit concentrates are better than nothing, but then the hydrogen is missing. He does the following, using the example of a high-performance athlete:
Lactic acid, which is always problematic in high-performance sports, is broken down more quickly by drinking alkaline water, thereby increasing overall performance.
In addition, high-performance sports produce a particularly large number of reactive oxygen species (free radicals), which can be neutralized by the high hydrogen content of the active water. In this way, damage to the tent due to overexertion can be avoided.
Furthermore, taking any sports nutrition, such as protein-vitamin-mineral powder, etc. with the help of alkaline active water two things:
Firstly, this increases the absorption capacity.
Secondly, the high hydrogen content and the alkalinity of the mixed mixture enable faster metabolism of these nutritional supplements.
Of course, the same applies to fruit juices and vegetable juices that are mixed with fresh alkaline active water.
If you eat a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, it is also recommended that you soak them in fresh alkaline active water about 15 minutes before consumption, as this can reverse the oxidative aging caused by long storage and long transport distances, and these fruits in their entirety Food quality can be revitalized and its quality improved by the effortlessly penetrating hydrogen.
By the way, pickling even works with whole eggs because the eggshell is permeable to hydrogen.
However, eggs should be left in for 20-30 minutes.
I hope I don't get on your last nerve, but I don't want to regret the investment and make a qualified decision first. Unfortunately, the experts are extremely divided...
>Unfortunately, there is no expert community, but rather speculative discussants who all claim something and firmly believe in it, and state it so credibly that you as an interested party also believe it.
The experts, the only one in Europe, is Mr. Asenbaum, unfortunately everyone else is just some scientists who have simply accepted the 73 anomalies and do not question them.
In the USA there is still the EZ-Water researcher, Gerhard Pollack:
http://faculty.washington.edu/ghp/
But otherwise, unfortunately, “real” water researchers can only be found far and wide in Asia and Russia, but there is also the language barrier...
Hope the red answers help you.
I look forward to further questions
Yours, Yasin Akgün
Kind regards, Mirko N.
