Karin T.: I had various samples with alkaline and acidic water tested on me using the bioresonance method, and it was found that I react positively to acidic water and negatively to alkaline water. Do you have any insight into what this means?
Bioresonance testing does not allow any conclusions
According to scientific criteria, this means nothing at all. The bioresonance method is one of the suggestive methods in which the practitioner or diagnostician uses technical show effects to try to produce the desired results. Bioresonance measurements have been propagated for diagnostics and even therapy since 1977. They are technically based on the E-meter used by Scientologists and are used under various names, especially among alternative practitioners and “alternative doctors”.
The devices were originally called Mora, later also called biocommunication, bicom, bioresonance therapy devices (BRT), or multicom and multiresonance therapy. Other names: VegaSelect, Biophysical Information Therapy (BIT), MoraColor, Tricom, Audiocolor, Diagnostic Resonance Therapy (DRT), Sequential Frequency Diagnostics, Lycotronic Therapy, SomaDyne, VegaSTT, Matrix Regeneration Therapy, etc.
The Society for the Scientific Study of Parascience writes: “The use may be harmless, but sick people who rely on its effects may miss necessary treatment.
The claim that treatment with bioresonance can help save medication is dangerous:
Two deaths have been documented because healers stopped insulin-dependent children with diabetes I: One alternative practitioner was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year. The ruling has been legally binding since 1995...Bioresonance therapy must be seen as misleading customers (...) Doctors who (use) bioresonance should be aware that they are supporting a globally operating financial mafia, says Aktion Bildungsinformation.
The Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology warns doctors and patients against using this procedure; In the USA it was banned as early as 1986, and in Germany it was excluded from coverage by health insurance companies or subsidies in 1995.”
(Source: http://www.gwup.org/infos/themen-nach- gebiet/843-bioresonanztherapie?catid=77%3Akompleme ntaer-und-alternativmedizin-cam).
Bioresonance testing therefore does not allow any statements to be made about the effect of activated water. Something else is different -> taste sensations, which do exist.
Excerpt from the book by Karl Heinz Asenbaum: “Electro-activated water – An invention with extraordinary potential. Water ionizers from A – Z”
Copyright 2016 www.euromultimedia.de
